I just finished the New York bestseller Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores The Hidden Side Of Everything by Levitt and Dubner. Much like my experience with Shane Hipps book, I was about a quarter through before I had to take a necessary reading detour with school last semester. After refreshing myself on the first 50 pages, I dove in and it was fascinating. This is one of those unique books that I found entering into a plethora of conversations on many different levels. Like a water drenched sponge, it saturated my thinking to the extent that I found it distilling into various areas of my thinking, reflections and conversations – coercing me to ask deeper questions about seemingly ordinary things.

Freakonomics may not have a solidifying theme but it does have a common thread as it discusses and critiques conventional wisdom from an economist point of view. I found myself repeatedly and verbally saying “fascinating” and “interesting” or “You’ve go to be kidding me” to the point where I was sure that others around me thought I was going crazy. All in all, it is an intriguing read and one that has made me question “conventional wisdom” and the fears and agendas it often feeds from.

If you haven’t read it yet…it is worth your time and money.

Well off to my next book: The Search to Belong by Joseph R. Myers.

I got a little behind in my reading this last weekend (things were insanely busy) and I am in the process of catching up. I finished Coming Home: To The Father Who Loves You a few days ago by Robert Jeffress and was disappointed. I guess the book is what it is but I was expecting something different and more profound. The book is based (more loosely than I anticipated) on the biblical story of the prodigal son and since I am thinking of preaching on it soon, I thought would be helpful. This was one of those times when the jacket cover seduced me. I though it might be better, more theological and reflective, giving me insights into this amazing story of Scripture but instead, I would define it as your typical “problem + solution = success” book. There were points where the book implied that if you felt far from God then with “these three or six things” you can fix the problem and have success in your relationship with God and thus in life. I don’t know? I just find the Bible and my life to be way more complicated than that and I ironically find that complication soothing. I don’t think God created us as a spiritual math problem and the Bible as the formula for success (as we in North America have defined it).

Instead, I think God is way more complicated and mysterious than that and on many levels I find books like this, or any spiritual message like this, troublesome. Maybe I’m just weird and bizarre and I’m alone in my questions, but I have a sneaking suspicion there are others out there like me. Others who find their spiritual lives to be way more complex and even their relationship with God to be more elusive and unformulative (I think I just made that word up) than these books or messages portray? Or, perhaps, I am quasi normal and there are others out there who either feel guilty their loves don’t line up with the formula or their problems easily solved by it. Or maybe they just think they are alone and are too afraid to speak up. If that is the case, I hope you can find comfort in others like me.

I believe truth is more than a formula or pattern…Jesus (the way the truth and the life) lived in a way that was unformulated. Even though the Pharisees tried to evaluate Jesus by their legalistic and self-serving spiritual formulas, Jesus reversed their formulistic view of God. In fact, I think human formulas by nature of their human origin, are self-serving. Like any postmodern, I question any formula that starts with a preferred answer and builds the formula to create that answer. This is the same reason why I agree with others that in many ways the modern scientific method is flawed – but that is a post for another time.

Anyways off to a completely different book I need to finish: “Freakonomics” by Levitt and Dubner.

Well I finished my first of 30 books in 90 days and I’ve been keeping up with my Bible reading. I enjoy reading and I normally do a decent amount of it, but this much reading is proving to be a bit of a challenge.

In terms of the book The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture by Shane Hipps, I found the first half incredibly interesting. I have to admit that I started reading the book several months ago but only worked my way through the first third of it until life got too crazy and the book ended up collecting dust. After re-reading some of the first third and the working my way through the rest, I found the second half to spark a lot of thought and reflection. I disagree with some of his conclusions but the main point of the book is fascinating. I agree with Hipps that the church has not dealt or reflected on how much it, as a medium, has affected the message (referring to the writings of McLuhan). The old adage that the medium can change but the message stays the same is well critiqued throughout this book. I agree with Hipps that the medium can’t remain neutral and inadvertently and with profoundly affects alters or even skews the message.

I also found his comments of Satellite churches to be interesting in regards to the medium having a profound affect of the message – even contradicting itself. If, as Hipps asserts, the church is the medium Christ choose to communicate his message, then we need to take that seriously. We can’t continue to pretend that media and technology are neutral in the life of the church. I am not against using technology, anyone who knows me knows this, but the medium has to always be evaluated and reflected upon so that we may understand how it is affecting, changing or altering the message. If we ignore that reality and ignorantly assume it is neutral and unbiased, then we are in danger of radically affecting the message of the marvellous gospel we are commissioned to share.

This book has prompted and reminded me to think and evaluate my use of technology personally and within the church. I am not going to give it up, but I will try to persistently consider its affect on the message and my faith.

Overall, it is a stimulating read. It has much of the same base material as authors like Postman and McLuhan but from a theological/ecclesiological point of view – one I found fascinating. Once again, I don’t agree with some of Hipps solutions but his critiques and insights are well-worth the price of the book.

Well, on to my next book: “Coming Home: To the Father Who Loves You.”