fbpx

Book #9 of 30: a.k.a. Lost

After reading the book “a.k.a. Lost” by Jim Henderson I was disappointed. I wasn’t so much disappointed with the book’s content but I think I set my hopes way to high. It isn’t that I think it is poor book (On the contrary, I think it is a good filled with great ideas), I was just expecting some newer ideas. Maybe it’s because I’ve read a lot of recent books on evangelism and for the most part this book echoed similar ideas/concepts.

There are several things I took away from this book. One is the idea of doing the common in evangelism, using the analogy of Seinfeld Evangelism and that we need to look at our evangelistic opportunities more like a Seinfeld episode where it is just about ordinary life. I agree…I am just an ordinary person and need ordinary forms of evangelism and ways to look at it. Second, I really liked the book’s focus on listening, something we can all do more of whatever our religious bent. It is something I need to practice more in my life and Henderson’s idea of “non-manipulative intentionality” was interesting. I think that is something we all need to consider.

Although it is still mulling over in my mind, the question Henderson asks of the Church and as individual Christians is poignant: “What business are we in? Are we defenders of God’s refutation, or are we the proclaimers of his love?” (Page 84) This is something I have thought a lot about and have been working through in my ministry and life in various ways. This has once again prompted me to think and reflect on that question in greater detail.

What I found troubling was that although he argues against the sales-pitch approach to evangelism, which is evident in modern evangelism techniques (even that phrase demonstrated that), the alternative he gives still seems to smell like a sale pitch – just in a more relational one. I guess I wonder if we aren’t talking about getting rid of sales evangelism and instead we’re talking about replacing it with a different, more relational, sales technique. Much like the change in sales techniques in our culture, which is now more relational than ever. It seems that instead of looking at a completely different model we are just altering the modern on to better suit our culture.

It isn’t that I am arguing with what Henderson is presenting…his ideas are a welcome change and I agree with many of them. I guess I am just wondering if we can ever be free from the concept of selling the gospel, because in some way we are by nature of persuading, attempting to have someone buy into the concept of God that we are in some way “selling.” Thus, ultimately the question needs to be asked: is that necessarily bad? A great question worth pondering but I think we’ll leave the question of persuasion for another day.

When it comes to evangelism, I think we need to focus on the great commandment and remember that we are called to love with nothing in return. The opposite of sales…we are called to radically give away love because we have been loved – to live through word and deed the message of love. Maybe in that there is an element of persuasion…to persuade to the point of love…and is that bad? Is that manipulative? I think that is a question we need to continue asking of ourselves. It is one I need to reflect upon.

Book #8 of 30: The Secret Message of Jesus

I finished reading “The Secret Message of Jesus” by Brian McLaren. It was thought provoking, introducing some new ideas and concepts that were fairly intriguing. Although I don’t always agree with Brian I always find myself in a virtual conversation with him as I read his books – there is something compelling about that. With all the hype leading to the release of this book about it being controversial, I found it almost a let down as it was not as controversial as I was expecting. Maybe I am not as conservative as some and find his writing less problematic.

If you are interested in reading a great article/review of the book my friend James (I now call him Prof. James) has written a fabulous one here. For me I found several things compelling. First, you have to begin with title and the overall theme of the book. I have asked similar questions as to why Jesus made his message so seemingly unclear and almost hidden in metaphors and parables. If you have read the gospels you have probably asked this exact same question. I think McLaren does a great job at unpacking the historical context which I think helps to free the often entrapped message of Jesus from our North American individualism that often seems to imprison Jesus’ message. Second, McLaren has wonderful explanation about the Kingdom of God being the Dream of God and how Jesus’ radical message of how to live can produce a change – a transformation – that is revolutionary.

Third, I also think that the reason the message of Jesus isn’t clear is because it, in itself, is part of the message. Jesus asked questions and invited interaction, which is fundamental to any relationship – real relationship based on love. Think about that…Jesus answered a small fraction of questions in the New Testament and asked them in disproportionate abundance. That promotes relationship; Jesus listened and taught in ways that made people think, reflect, contemplate, mull over, question, argue, debate, seek clarification. It is not only compelling but highly effective.

McLaren also takes the book of Revelation and sees it through the lens of the Kingdom of God. I think he is on to something here… I too would argue that when we take the culture, the genre and the message of Jesus in the New Testament and interpret the message of Revelation, we end up with a very different view then your typical pop-culture interpretation. A fantastic book on this topic is a book written by a brilliant former professor of mine, Paul Spilsbury, entitled: “The Throne, The Lamb and The Dragon.” Spilsbury, along with many Biblical Scholars, interpret the book of Revelation in a way that is more connected with its original intent – that is a post for a different time.

I think the danger of McLaren’s interpretation is that you soon begin to find the Kingdom of God in everything – even to the point of finding it in places it was never intended to be. Much like the allegory of old, we begin to read into the next rather than have the text read into us. That being said, there is something also very dangerous about limited the message of Jesus as well. In North American, we have largely limited it to personal salvation and ignored the rest. Think about it, if the Message of Jesus was just about personal salvation…one parable or sermon would have been enough but it is so much more. That doesn’t dismiss the individually responsibility of each person to make a commitment to Christ, but it is also so much more. The problem is we have focused on the former and in the process buried the later.

Halloween: Ghosts, Goblins and Physics

So I was browsing the web and I came across an interesting article written by a physicist on the science behind ghosts, vampires, zombies, etc. The article is fascinating to be sure, but what I found most intriguing was the reminder of all the myths and false assumptions that we as a culture can easy assume or adopt as fact without even considering basic common sense. Although I believe in the supernatural, it is amazing how much we adopt from the media and culture in our sub-conscious psyche’s when it comes to things we don’t understand or can’t explain.

Here is the link to the article:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0608/0608059.pdf

Untangling Culture From Christianity

The following post is an article I wrote for our Church’s Monthly Newsletter. It was inspired by my trip to Bolivia and thought you may find it interesting…

LESSONS FROM BOLIVIA: UNTANGLING CULTURE FROM CHRISTIANITY


Cultural Differences

One of the many things my mission’s trip to Bolivia has caused me to reflect upon is the reality and influences of culture in our lives, specifically in Christianity. Although I knew cultural differences would exist, I didn’t realize that they would exist in such stark contrast. For example, there are obvious differences between what South Americans consider personal space issues verses what we consider personal space. There are also striking differences in what “on time” means as we have a very scheduled culture and expectations, where South American culture is very laid back and things start when enough people arrive. There is also the difference of our very individualistic culture while their culture is more based on community. There are also differences in how we as North America consider and find “stuff” important compared to those who live in the third world, where they are more focused on community rather than commodity.

Although I never directly experienced this, I was also told that in Bolivia, and probably for many South American cultures, it is culturally unacceptable to deny a request. For example, if you are invited to attend a birthday party, it is an insult to deny someone’s invitation. Instead, it is more polite to say you will be there (even if you won’t) rather than to offend the other person by saying you have a previous commitment. South America is also a very different culture in that people are very willing to do what you ask of them. One of the things my friend Ken told me was that if I were to have an alter call and have people physically respond by coming forward after a church service, almost everyone would. They would do it whether or not they agreed with what you were teaching or not. Even if they disagree with you, it is just polite to do what is asked.

Those are just some of the examples of cultural differences between North and South American cultures. These differences have prompted me to reflect upon a number of issues related to culture and Christianity. Christianity, at its core, is not a Western belief system, but an ongoing life-transforming relationship with God that supersedes culture, language, time, nations, genders, etc. Although our cultural expression of Christianity may be “western,” Christianity is not. This is the entanglement that has demanded my attention lately, the determination and distinction between the core message of Jesus and the North American, western, twenty-first century expression of Christianity.

Christianity Beyond Culture And The Compulsion It Creates
I think that if we truly believe that the Good News of Jesus is essential and applicable in every time, culture, language, nation and genre, then it would make a fundamental and radical difference to us. Thus as we, and those on our behalf (Missionaries), bring the message of Jesus to others, we first and foremost bring a message of life – an invitation to be a part of the Kingdom of God. We bring a message that it as applicable and desperately needed to any culture around our globe at any time in history.

But we also need to understand and realize that each culture needs to express their love for God differently and for us to convert them to “western” culture is not what we are called to do and I would strongly argue that it is also both counter-productive and wrong. Instead, we need to understand that each culture needs to express their love for God within their own language and culture.

This is dramatically presented in the scene from the movie “The Mission,” where we see the main character, played by Robert De Niro, hauling a massive organ up a mountain under the false pretense that the people of that culture couldn’t worship God without it. In essence, he confused a cultural expression with the core and essential message of Jesus.

Moving One Culture Closer
You may be reading this and saying that you agree with me and missionaries need to do this all the time but I would like to challenge your thinking one step further. Although we may find it easy to say that Missionaries need to do this and should do this in their ministries, I also believe that there is a need for us to constantly be rethinking this in our own ministry context in North America. When you look at your life, as well as the ministry of Devon Alliance Church, what are the cultural expressions that you, or we, have established as essential to the Gospel message of Jesus?

Knowing Culture… Explaining God
Which leads me to this… in order to know how to communicate God’s truth and love in any culture, Missions 101, we have to know the culture in which we are sharing God’s love and the message of salvation with. I think we would all agree that the colonial way of doing missions was both unwise and wrong. The colonial missions philosophy transported culture and cultural expression of Christianity and radically confused it with the core message of Jesus. Instead, we need to learn a culture and understand it so we can explain and share the message of Jesus with the people in it – the timeless, language-less, genderless and cultureless message of Jesus. But to do this we MUST know and live in the culture. We can’t explain or interpret something to those we don’t know or understand.

It would be like the Americans I heard about in Bolivia who arrived on a mission’s trip to the boy’s home and were under the false presumption that if they talked loader and slower the boys would understand them. That somehow English spoken slow and loud equated Spanish. The same goes with Christianity. We have to know and understand the culture to which we are sharing it with – to do it any other way would be meaningless.

This is the example we see in Scripture with Paul at Mars Hill in Acts 17. Here Paul uses culture and the local philosophy/religion to share that the unknown God they were worshipping is the God who sent his son Jesus; the same Jesus who lived and died for them so that they could have and live the abundant and eternal life in Him. We need to learn from Paul in how we view missions and evangelism. In order to know the culture we have to live in it. The Bible says to be in the world but not of it (John 17:15-16). We have too often focused on the second half of that phrase and forget that we need to live in the world, culture and society to interact and share the life-transforming message of Jesus with those in it.

In Bolivia there are some examples of those who I would argue have gone to the extreme of not being a part of the world. There are several Mennonite colonies in Bolivia that only speak German and live very separated lives from the society at large. It is quite bizarre to walk down the street in South America and see a traditional Mennonite family from an isolated colony, as you would see in Canada, walking down the street. The problem with this philosophy, whether lived exuberantly or subtly, is that God’s message stays within rather than moves out. Think of the phrase “abundant life” (John 10:10). This phrase implies that there is so much life, it is overflowing and must be shared. I would even argue that it can’t, by definition, be horded or protected… it must, by its very existence, be shared and given away.

The Message of Jesus and Us
We need to consider how we view the Gospel, the Good News of Jesus. Have we relegated it to our cultural expressions and substituted those insufficient expressions for the life changing/transforming message of Jesus. If we truly believe this, I contest that our voices and our passion for the lost would grow and our heart for missions would explode. And consequently, our desire for the Kingdom of God (the dream of God) would begin to germinate in our lives and in the world.

Connecting the dots of culture, technology, faith, ministry, mission and life.